Tuesday, April 05, 2005
The Difference between DC and Marvel
Yes, there is a difference. Coke is a cola. Pepsi is a cola. Coke and Pespi do not taste alike; most people drink one and not the other, and the people who do drink them indiscriminately are usually waiting for what they really want, alcohol.
When I read on-line pablum about, "I just enjoy whatever, and shouldn't we all just read good stories wherever they are written, and I don't think there is a difference, and I want to read a cross-over where Iron Man dates Power Girl, and why can't we just all get along?," I want to take an uzi into a bar and slay a score of second-rate villains in a hail of bullets. But I don't. Why? Because that's a Marvel thing to do, and I'm a DC person. It says so in the blog title.
One of the examples of the Difference Between DC and Marvel is in their panthea (or pantheons, if you're allergic to Greek plurals).
The Greek Gods, the gods of tragedy, are the gods of the DCU.
The Norse Gods, the gods of opera, are the gods of the Marvel.
We see lots of gods and godlings in the DCU: fun, forgotten ones in Vertigo, ham-handed manques like the New Gods, decorative dieties like Rao tossed about the universe like theurgic throw-pillows to spice up alien cultures. But for the most part, the "gods" in the DCU means Zeus & Co. Yes, the Greek Gods, the gods of founders of Western Civilization, the people who brought you self-government, logic, and couple other useful concepts, like: tragedy. Now, not every DC story is a tragedy, of course. But if you set aside the "gosh, that's sad and icky" part of tragedy, its underlying tenet is that what happens to you, your fate, is the usually the result of your own character, not just random happenstance.
Batman's "fate" isn't thrust upon him by a cruel world that fails to understand him. Bruce Wayne could, at any point say, "Well, this is fruitless! Alfred, pack my bags, buy a Caribbean island (if I don't already own one), and tell Silver St. Cloud I'll meet her there for brunch!" But he doesn't, because his character is otherwise.
Superman isn't enfeebled by the mistrust of a xenophobic society, forcing him to hide as a mild-mannered drudge. "Gosh," Superman could say, "I think I'll rule the world today, then write about it in my gigantic steel diary using my fingernails." Because of his character, Superman chooses (like Cinncinnatus) to rise up above other people only when it is necessary to protect society; otherwise, he chooses to live among them as equals. Whatever "tragic fate" these and other characters suffer stems from their own virtues and flaws (which usually aren't fatal, unless you were a member of Justice League International, like Ted, Tora, those foxy French sisters, and Amazingly-Brittle Man).
But Marvel's gods are the Norse ones, who, in our culture, we know mostly through opera. It's fitting; Marvel is about personal drama, people thrust into extraordinarily roles and situations (usually against their will) by life's vicissitudes (you know, errant chromosomes, cosmic rays, radioactive spiders, and such). It's opera, not tragedy, because you are watching people suffer unjustly, to see how they stand up to it all (like on Fear Factor).
DC's message? You are responsible for protecting and improving yourself and society, so toughen up for that responsiblity.
Marvel's message? You better be tough, because you're going to have to suffer many things in this world that you're not responsible for and can't improve.
Both messages are completely true, of course, which is why each company does speak effectively to so many people. But, in my eyes, DC's message is designed to inspire and Marvel's message is designed to console.
And I know which I prefer.
Labels: comic books, difference between DC and Marvel
Comments:
Links to this post:
<< Home
This article was very eye-opening, and although you did toss a bit of a negative light on Marvel, I could really appreciate this.
I woulkd take it a step further. Like the Greeks, DC has tragedies and comedies. The end point of the story for a given character is either death (in a tragedy), or marriage (in a comedy). In that sense, Batman and Superman are the opposing poles of the DC universe.
Batman is a tragedy. Bruce Wayne dies at the end. Sooner, or later, he will get just old enough that his reflexes will fail him and he will die. That was the point of "The Dark Knight Returns", in spite of the last page.
Superman is a comedy. Clark Kent is the Last Son of Krypton. His central problem is finding someone with whom he can reproduce. The whole system of the story is designed around that problem. Lois Lane cannot be with Superman, so he lies to her about his double identity. The dude lives in the Fortress of Solitude for God's Sake.
Every DC hero is designed in more or less the same way. Wonder Woman is a comedy. Green Lantern is a tragedy (look at Abin Sur), etc.
Marvel is more modern in a sense. There are no clear end points to most of the stories. I guess Bruce Banner probably won't end well, but I doubt that it is a tragedy per se. The characters are neurotic. That makes their problems a lot smaller. However, they can be resolved and still move forward. Spider-Man getting married was not an end point.
Batman is a tragedy. Bruce Wayne dies at the end. Sooner, or later, he will get just old enough that his reflexes will fail him and he will die. That was the point of "The Dark Knight Returns", in spite of the last page.
Superman is a comedy. Clark Kent is the Last Son of Krypton. His central problem is finding someone with whom he can reproduce. The whole system of the story is designed around that problem. Lois Lane cannot be with Superman, so he lies to her about his double identity. The dude lives in the Fortress of Solitude for God's Sake.
Every DC hero is designed in more or less the same way. Wonder Woman is a comedy. Green Lantern is a tragedy (look at Abin Sur), etc.
Marvel is more modern in a sense. There are no clear end points to most of the stories. I guess Bruce Banner probably won't end well, but I doubt that it is a tragedy per se. The characters are neurotic. That makes their problems a lot smaller. However, they can be resolved and still move forward. Spider-Man getting married was not an end point.
It's an interesting case, but haven't you been selective to make it? Take a look at that selective use of cynicism in the whole "Bruce Wayne could buy an island and retire" thing you use to establish how master of his fate Batman is. If that's up for grabs then so is the whole question of why a brilliant, handsome, billionaire decides the best way to help people is to dress up and hit people. Does he lack vision? Is he profoundly undemocratic (well, that's a given, really)? Why not be President Wayne- surely within his grasp- and effect root and branch reform of criminal justice?
Not that I want to see that in a comic, it would be like Green Team meets Prez, but I think you open Batman to the charge of neurotic nutjob when you employ that level of cynicism.
Not that I want to see that in a comic, it would be like Green Team meets Prez, but I think you open Batman to the charge of neurotic nutjob when you employ that level of cynicism.
I don't really see Marvel as the pity-balm for comic readers. Any one of Marvel's characters can turn away from do-gooding whenever (and they have), but found it's not in their nature to turn away. Spider-Man has his problems, but he goes back out everyday with the hope that it will get better, or else, why would he go out? Why is he upset when Shocker tries to rob a bank for the two hundredth time? Hope. Sucks when it doesn't turn out your way, and rocks when it does.
Look at the Fantastic Four. For all the problems that come up for them, they're happy. They fight Dr. Doom and go home. They stop Blastaar from taking over the Negative Zone and go home. They rescue Johnny from the comanauts of Rigellou-IX and go home, waich movies and sleep peacefully.
The real difference I see between Marvel and DC is that there are more Marvel stories where the hero is torn down and rises over his failure, and there are more DC stories where the villain tries to tear down the hero and fails.
For me, it's more inspiring to see someone pull himself than to constantly see someone never fail (at least until the next Crisis comes around).
Look at the Fantastic Four. For all the problems that come up for them, they're happy. They fight Dr. Doom and go home. They stop Blastaar from taking over the Negative Zone and go home. They rescue Johnny from the comanauts of Rigellou-IX and go home, waich movies and sleep peacefully.
The real difference I see between Marvel and DC is that there are more Marvel stories where the hero is torn down and rises over his failure, and there are more DC stories where the villain tries to tear down the hero and fails.
For me, it's more inspiring to see someone pull himself than to constantly see someone never fail (at least until the next Crisis comes around).
情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,A片,視訊聊天室,聊天室,視訊,視訊聊天室,080苗栗人聊天室,上班族聊天室,成人聊天室,中部人聊天室,一夜情聊天室,情色聊天室,視訊交友網
免費A片,AV女優,美女視訊,情色交友,免費AV,色情網站,辣妹視訊,美女交友,色情影片,成人影片,成人網站,A片,H漫,18成人,成人圖片,成人漫畫,情色網,日本A片,免費A片下載,性愛
A片,色情,成人,做愛,情色文學,A片下載,色情遊戲,色情影片,色情聊天室,情色電影,免費視訊,免費視訊聊天,免費視訊聊天室,一葉情貼圖片區,情色,情色視訊,免費成人影片,視訊交友,視訊聊天,視訊聊天室,言情小說,愛情小說,AIO,AV片,A漫,avdvd,聊天室,自拍,情色論壇,視訊美女,AV成人網,色情A片,SEX,成人論壇
情趣用品,A片,免費A片,AV女優,美女視訊,情色交友,色情網站,免費AV,辣妹視訊,美女交友,色情影片,成人網站,H漫,18成人,成人圖片,成人漫畫,成人影片,情色網
情趣用品,A片,免費A片,日本A片,A片下載,線上A片,成人電影,嘟嘟成人網,成人,成人貼圖,成人交友,成人圖片,18成人,成人小說,成人圖片區,微風成人區,成人文章,成人影城,情色,情色貼圖,色情聊天室,情色視訊,情色文學,色情小說,情色小說,臺灣情色網,色情,情色電影,色情遊戲,嘟嘟情人色網,麗的色遊戲,情色論壇,色情網站,一葉情貼圖片區,做愛,性愛,美女視訊,辣妹視訊,視訊聊天室,視訊交友網,免費視訊聊天,美女交友,做愛影片
av,情趣用品,a片,成人電影,微風成人,嘟嘟成人網,成人,成人貼圖,成人交友,成人圖片,18成人,成人小說,成人圖片區,成人文章,成人影城,愛情公寓,情色,情色貼圖,色情聊天室,情色視訊,情色文學,色情小說,情色小說,色情,寄情築園小遊戲,情色電影,aio,av女優,AV,免費A片,日本a片,美女視訊,辣妹視訊,聊天室,美女交友,成人光碟
情趣用品.A片,情色,情色貼圖,色情聊天室,情色視訊,情色文學,色情小說,情色小說,色情,寄情築園小遊戲,情色電影,色情遊戲,色情網站,聊天室,ut聊天室,豆豆聊天室,美女視訊,辣妹視訊,視訊聊天室,視訊交友網,免費視訊聊天,免費A片,日本a片,a片下載,線上a片,av女優,av,成人電影,成人,成人貼圖,成人交友,成人圖片,18成人,成人小說,成人圖片區,成人文章,成人影城,成人網站,自拍,尋夢園聊天室
免費A片,AV女優,美女視訊,情色交友,免費AV,色情網站,辣妹視訊,美女交友,色情影片,成人影片,成人網站,A片,H漫,18成人,成人圖片,成人漫畫,情色網,日本A片,免費A片下載,性愛
A片,色情,成人,做愛,情色文學,A片下載,色情遊戲,色情影片,色情聊天室,情色電影,免費視訊,免費視訊聊天,免費視訊聊天室,一葉情貼圖片區,情色,情色視訊,免費成人影片,視訊交友,視訊聊天,視訊聊天室,言情小說,愛情小說,AIO,AV片,A漫,avdvd,聊天室,自拍,情色論壇,視訊美女,AV成人網,色情A片,SEX,成人論壇
情趣用品,A片,免費A片,AV女優,美女視訊,情色交友,色情網站,免費AV,辣妹視訊,美女交友,色情影片,成人網站,H漫,18成人,成人圖片,成人漫畫,成人影片,情色網
情趣用品,A片,免費A片,日本A片,A片下載,線上A片,成人電影,嘟嘟成人網,成人,成人貼圖,成人交友,成人圖片,18成人,成人小說,成人圖片區,微風成人區,成人文章,成人影城,情色,情色貼圖,色情聊天室,情色視訊,情色文學,色情小說,情色小說,臺灣情色網,色情,情色電影,色情遊戲,嘟嘟情人色網,麗的色遊戲,情色論壇,色情網站,一葉情貼圖片區,做愛,性愛,美女視訊,辣妹視訊,視訊聊天室,視訊交友網,免費視訊聊天,美女交友,做愛影片
av,情趣用品,a片,成人電影,微風成人,嘟嘟成人網,成人,成人貼圖,成人交友,成人圖片,18成人,成人小說,成人圖片區,成人文章,成人影城,愛情公寓,情色,情色貼圖,色情聊天室,情色視訊,情色文學,色情小說,情色小說,色情,寄情築園小遊戲,情色電影,aio,av女優,AV,免費A片,日本a片,美女視訊,辣妹視訊,聊天室,美女交友,成人光碟
情趣用品.A片,情色,情色貼圖,色情聊天室,情色視訊,情色文學,色情小說,情色小說,色情,寄情築園小遊戲,情色電影,色情遊戲,色情網站,聊天室,ut聊天室,豆豆聊天室,美女視訊,辣妹視訊,視訊聊天室,視訊交友網,免費視訊聊天,免費A片,日本a片,a片下載,線上a片,av女優,av,成人電影,成人,成人貼圖,成人交友,成人圖片,18成人,成人小說,成人圖片區,成人文章,成人影城,成人網站,自拍,尋夢園聊天室
He's right of course. I don't need characters I can relate too, but I love characters I can look up too.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
<< Home



