Well, thank goodness for Mark Waid or I don't think I would have had anything enjoyable to read this month.
I did pick up the Shazam/Wonder Woman crossover, featuring Mary Marvel, as she is now (again), called (cleverly enough, I suppose). But it disappointed in three major ways and that's a lot for one small story.
Its depiction of Hera as a shrill harpy was over the top. I mean... even for Hera. There might have been some irony to be wrung out of Hera, a long put-upon woman under the thumb of a tyrannical, philandering husband, rebelling against, killing and supplanting him, only to become even worse.
This could work very well in a Wonder Woman comic: "See what you have become, sister!" But, no; it was mostly a slugfest. Exactly how the Gods should not be used. Which was the second disappointment. I like that the Greek gods are part of DCU's mythos and DC is often good about treating them as Something Apart. But when they don't --when they treat being a god as just some other flavor of superDUPER-supervillain-- well, that just misses the point of having gods in the mix at all, doesn't it?
Yes, it does miss the point. So, leave "The New Gods" alone, kids. Kirby had at least SOME idea how to handle them and you do not. |
And, third, of course, was the nearly inevitable re-apotheosis of Wonder Woman. Re-apotheosis: that's a word that should NEVER have to be written. But at this point, Wonder Woman might as well be classified as a were-god: every 30 months or so, when the publishing moon is full, she becomes a goddess (again).
I'm tired of explaining how stupid this is. It shouldn't even NEED to be explained (unless, you know, you're a Marvel reader and that sort of thing makes sense to you). Just stop it, DC.
Fortunately, I read the most recent issue of World's Finest, because, by Jasper, I wouldn't miss Simon Stagg's funeral for the world! And... and...
"characterized by even his few mourners as 'opportunistic' and 'abrasive' " |
and it read LIKE A COMIC BOOK.
Things HAPPENED. They happened fast, but clearly and things I didn't need to see happened off-panel and things I DID need to see happened in-panel. Friends like Batman and Superman (or mere colleagues like Metamorpho) had differences but worked through them quickly and the fact that they would remain friends was never called into question for cheap drama. Heroes were falsely accused but no one tried to trick us the readers into thinking they were guilty; the mystery was in how they were framed, and why, and by whom. The mystery was solved with effort, but within an issue and with contributions from all involved. The solution was logical but surprising and pulled in characters who broadened the scope and seriousness of the plot; it didn't foreclose the action but escalated it and ended on a cliffhanger that left me waiting for the next issue. It was a COMIC BOOK, like, well, like the Legion reboot that Mark Waid wrote almost 25 years ago in 1999, which I still remember as the most engaging on-going series I've ever read.
Thanks for making it look easy, Mark. I hope some other writers read your books, too.
Wait, didn't Simon Stagg die in THE TERRIFICS a couple of years ago?
ReplyDeleteYoung Dick Grayson tells me "World's Finest" is set earlier in the timeline.
DeleteMark Waid has a good understanding of DC's characters, and what an editor should do, and what a writer should do. He's solid.
ReplyDeleteI still miss his "Impulse" comic from the 90s. It managed to be fun and even sometimes heartwarming.
I'd also add that Waid understands comic books. As a format, a comic book has strengths and weaknesses, and he's capable of functioning within those boundaries. Failure to grasp the format leads us to plodding, sprawling, meaningless "epics" that trudge on for 24 issues, make no sense, and provide zero entertainment. If you held a gun to my head I couldn't effectively summarize whatever is going on in "Lazarus Planet." Nor do I particularly want to.
ReplyDeleteIf you want to see another writer that functions effectively in the comic book format, check out Sholly Fisch. Clean, effective storytelling in 22 pages.
Bryan - absolutely, yes. I don't necessarily like everything that Mark Waid writes, but at least I never have to ask myself, "what the hell did I just read?"
ReplyDeleteAnd most of Waid's material is solid. The only weakness I've noticed in his writing is more of a virtue overapplied. One of Waid's many tips on how to write a story well is, remember that every character (even the bit characters) want something. They aren't NPCs in a videogame who exist only to say "Welcome traveler! The roads are not safe because of the goblin horde 1.5 miles north of here." Every character has wishes, dislikes, motivations. It's good to remember that ... but if you lean into that too much, it's like telling an anecdote with too many diversions into side details that contribute nothing.
Anyway, Waid sometimes errs a bit in that regard, and the thrust of the story suffers a bit. But it's a small complaint, a Necessary Impurity as I think Waid might phrase it.
- HJF1
"check out Sholly Fisch."
ReplyDeleteI have written here repeatedly about how brilliant Sholly Fisch uses the medium. He is an absolute master.
Humbly requesting those lovely Scipio trademark hyperlinks
Deletehttps://absorbascon.blogspot.com/search?q=sholly
ReplyDeleteUsually, the announcement of another stab at the Fawcett characters elicits no emotion in me whatsoever. With Mark Waid writing and Dan Mora drawing, I’m actually looking forward to the upcoming Shazam book.
ReplyDelete- Mike Loughlin
Dan Mora can draw no wrong.
ReplyDeleteNote that when Tom King starts writing Wonder Woman ("Issue No.1 !") she'll be going on the law, hunted by the U.S. government.
ReplyDeleteOne presumes she will have shed her godhood by that point, underscoring how ridiculous this overused trope his already become.
Now I need to haul out my copies of Justice League: Year One from the closet and read them again.
ReplyDelete